{ "version": 1, "id": "Circe-inspector-e2e", "repo": "/home/abstergo/Programming/Circe", "repoName": "Circe", "scope": "inspector-e2e", "title": "Circe PR #6 inspector review", "sinceCommit": "35de6de98ea0e224eec011c0a77a97cb44ee50bc", "lastReviewCommit": "e7743111bea382d634bd492a831f445f8e9833b8", "reviewRound": 3, "loc": { "added": 1178, "removed": 147 }, "updatedAt": "2026-09-23T15:31:10.986856+00:00", "htmlPath": "/home/abstergo/Documents/reviews/Circe-inspector-e2e-abbyview.html", "jsonPath": "/home/abstergo/Documents/reviews/Circe-inspector-e2e-abbyview.json", "verdict": "COMMENT", "actionableOpen": 1, "mergeBlocking": 0, "baseline": { "frozenAt": "2026-09-23T15:08:42.618881+00:00", "title": "Circe PR #6 inspector review", "lede": "Three P1 contract defects, two P2 correctness/cleanup defects and one nonblocking P2 dead-code cleanup.", "walkthrough": { "prose": "PR #6 replaces the inspector CLI with a fixed end-to-end scenario and adds the host pipeline, a demo authority/executor, shared scenario mapping and six integration tests.", "bullets": [ "Observe actual authority snapshots and assemble a bounded context frame.", "Run the scripted Jev-backed decision workflow and derive exclusion/include propositions from accepted answers.", "Compile typed commands and execute them through the kernel and a file journal.", "Reopen the journal to compare recovered effect outcomes with the live run.", "A new collectRefKeys helper in shared perception is unused." ] }, "filesChanged": [ { "path": "apps/inspector/package.json", "delta": "+9 \u22123" }, { "path": "apps/inspector/src/cli.ts", "delta": "+147 \u2212144" }, { "path": "apps/inspector/src/demo.ts", "delta": "+134" }, { "path": "apps/inspector/src/pipeline.test.ts", "delta": "+225" }, { "path": "apps/inspector/src/pipeline.ts", "delta": "+147" }, { "path": "apps/inspector/src/scenario.ts", "delta": "+163" }, { "path": "packages/perception/src/proposals.ts", "delta": "+21" }, { "path": "pnpm-lock.yaml", "delta": "+15" } ], "flowDiagram": "Authority observations \u2192 context frame \u2192 accepted workflow decisions \u2192 host target mapping \u2192 compiler \u2192 kernel validation \u2192 demo executor \u2192 journal \u2192 recovery / reconciliation", "sinceCommit": "35de6de98ea0e224eec011c0a77a97cb44ee50bc", "loc": { "added": 861, "removed": 147 } }, "roundDeltas": [ { "round": 2, "from": "d5723b4e88eff95624cd33f0b14ecbbac8d7cce5", "to": "0d9e510b77a44c8f9f522a017876f27c60630453", "loc": { "added": 232, "removed": 73 }, "prose": "F66-F70 fixed. F65 partially fixed but still open for non-unique local option IDs. New nonblocking F71 covers operation record identity, replay and ownership.", "architecture": "The fixes stay within the right modules. Atomic precondition checks run synchronously in the demo executor; the file-journal fixture now owns its handles; the unused compiler traversal is gone. A small operation map is appropriate. Two contracts remain incomplete: option-to-entity identity must be unique, and an operation record must preserve the original request and outcome. These need local checks and snapshots, not more architecture.", "findingUpdates": [ { "id": "f65", "currentLines": "93-108", "body": "The new domain guard rejects C and checks the number of remaining entities, but it does not require each option to identify a unique canonical ref. R2-4 assembles two observed candidates with local ID B under different authorities and no A. Both pass the option-membership check. refForChoice picks the first B, and the other B becomes an executable resume target. Keep F65 open: require an unambiguous A/B option-to-ref mapping, or reject this incompatible scope.", "prompt": "Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nIn `apps/inspector/src/scenario.ts` around lines 93-108, finish F65 by checking a unique canonical entity mapping for each bounded option. The C expansion case now passes, but R2-4 in `/tmp/circe-pr6-evidence/round2.test.ts` supplies two B refs with different authorities and no A. Both pass the membership check, the first is excluded, and the second gets an executable resume command. For this fixed scenario, require exactly one intended A and B with unambiguous identities, or reject incompatible scopes. Do not infer identity from a bare local ID with first-match selection. Preserve the normal A/B inversion control and the extra-C rejection." } ] }, { "round": 3, "from": "0d9e510b77a44c8f9f522a017876f27c60630453", "to": "e7743111bea382d634bd492a831f445f8e9833b8", "loc": { "added": 189, "removed": 31 }, "prose": "F65 fixed; all original and round-2 reproductions pass. F71 retains one nonblocking receipt-identity edge case. No new finding IDs or merge blockers.", "architecture": "No remaining merge blockers. The unique option lookup fixes the host identity ambiguity, and the operation registry now handles ordinary replay, payload conflicts and caller-owned membership arrays. The changes are localized and use the existing host/executor contracts. A nonblocking receipt-identity gap remains in the demo replay branch. Returning the original recorded outcome would also make that branch simpler.", "findingUpdates": [ { "id": "f71", "currentLines": "137-156", "body": "F71 is substantially fixed: replay after drift, conflicting target payloads and caller-mutated effect membership now pass. One identity gap remains in the known-key branch. Its fingerprint omits effect identity, and its success receipt uses the incoming request.effectId. R3-1 repeats a recorded key and payload with a new effect ID and receives a success receipt for that never-recorded effect. Reject changed effect membership or return the original recorded receipt; do not mint a receipt from the replay request. This remains a nonblocking P2 in the demo executor.", "prompt": "Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nIn `apps/inspector/src/demo.ts` around lines 137-156, finish F71 by keeping the known-key receipt tied to recorded effect identity. The original R2-1/R2-2/R2-3 cases now pass. R3-1 in `/tmp/circe-pr6-evidence/round3.test.ts` repeats the same key and target payload with a different effectId/effectIds and receives SUCCEEDED with a receipt for that never-recorded effect. The fingerprint excludes effect identity and the replay branch constructs its receipt from the incoming request. Reject changed effect membership or return the original recorded receipt, rather than synthesizing a new successful receipt. Preserve matching replay after drift and known batch-member reconciliation; keep this a small in-process registry fix." } ] } ], "findings": [ { "id": "f65", "title": "Constrain \u201cthe other one\u201d to the bounded decision domain", "file": "apps/inspector/src/scenario.ts", "lines": "90-107", "pBadge": "P1", "severity": "major", "type": "logic", "category": "correctness", "section": "actionable", "status": "fixed", "fixedAt": "2026-09-23T15:31:10.986856+00:00", "reviewRound": 1, "followUp": false, "probes": "P6-2", "bodyParagraphs": [ "The scenario asks a referent decision whose options are A, B and none, but propositionsFromDecisions builds the executable include set from every candidate in the frame. Subtracting the risky choice from that larger set is only equivalent to \u201cthe other one\u201d when the frame contains exactly the intended pair.", "P6-2 adds an unrelated task C to the pipeline scope while leaving the accepted decisions unchanged: sketchy=B and operation=task.resume. The run reports RESOLVED and the pipeline invokes both A and C. C was never in the bounded referent question. The existing answer-inversion test proves the A/B case, but it does not establish that the host preserves the decision domain or singular cardinality.", "For this deliberately fixed scenario, reject a scope that cannot identify a unique remaining member of the intended pair. Alternatively derive decision options and target selection from an explicitly identified domain. Do not broaden a singular request to every retrieved candidate. This needs a small contract check, not an English interpreter." ], "fix": "Bind the reference scenario to a unique, explicit A/B candidate domain and require one remaining target. Reject or clarify an incompatible scope before emitting executable propositions.", "prompt": "Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nIn `apps/inspector/src/scenario.ts` around lines 90-107, keep `propositionsFromDecisions` within the candidate domain actually supplied to the referent decision. P6-2 in `/tmp/circe-pr6-evidence/inspector.test.ts` adds C to the frame, accepts sketchy=B and resume, and observes A plus C invoked. The current mapping includes every frame candidate before applying the exclusion. For this fixed scenario, guard the exact intended pair and require one remaining target, or explicitly bind options to a unique domain. Preserve the A/B inversion control. Reject ambiguous or extra-domain scopes rather than silently widening \u201cthe other one\u201d; do not introduce language heuristics.", "verification": "Unique canonical option lookup and complete A/B domain validation reject duplicate local IDs and missing/extra-domain candidates. R2-4 and all original scope controls pass.", "verifiedAtCommit": "e7743111bea382d634bd492a831f445f8e9833b8", "currentLines": "93-108" }, { "id": "f66", "title": "Honor the atomic precondition contract at invocation", "file": "apps/inspector/src/demo.ts", "lines": "105-111", "pBadge": "P1", "severity": "major", "type": "logic", "category": "correctness", "section": "actionable", "status": "fixed", "fixedAt": "2026-09-23T15:22:42.333539+00:00", "reviewRound": 1, "followUp": false, "probes": "P6-3", "bodyParagraphs": [ "taskResume advertises conditionalApply=\"atomic\", but the demo executor ignores InvokeRequest.preconditions and immediately records every binding as invoked. The earlier authority validation cannot provide atomic execution: the world may move after that validation and before the executor applies the request.", "P6-3 wraps the authority validator so it returns current for A version 1, then changes A to version 2 before returning control to the runtime. The executor still records A and returns SUCCEEDED. The retained drift test moves the world before validation, so it exercises only the earlier check and misses this boundary.", "The inspector is intended to demonstrate the full contract, and its executor is the part responsible for this guarantee. Compare all frozen preconditions against the demo world immediately before recording or applying any effect, with no asynchronous gap. On mismatch, fail without touching any target. If the demo does not implement that contract, it must not advertise atomic application." ], "fix": "Check every frozen precondition in the demo executor before any application; return a stale or invalidated failure on disagreement. Keep the check and apply synchronous within the in-process world.", "prompt": "Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nIn `apps/inspector/src/demo.ts` around lines 105-111, implement the conditional application that `taskResume.execution.conditionalApply` advertises. P6-3 in `/tmp/circe-pr6-evidence/inspector.test.ts` changes A from version 1 to version 2 after authority validation reports current but before dispatch. `invoke` currently ignores request.preconditions, records A and returns SUCCEEDED. Validate all preconditions against the current demo world before any target is applied or recorded, then perform the application without an asynchronous gap. Return a typed stale/invalidated failure on mismatch. Preserve ordinary execution and the existing pre-validation drift test; add the post-validation drift case.", "verifiedAtCommit": "0d9e510b77a44c8f9f522a017876f27c60630453", "verification": "P6-3 now passes: post-validation drift prevents invocation." }, { "id": "f67", "title": "Reconcile from recorded executor outcomes", "file": "apps/inspector/src/demo.ts", "lines": "109-120", "pBadge": "P1", "severity": "major", "type": "logic", "category": "data-integrity", "section": "actionable", "status": "fixed", "fixedAt": "2026-09-23T15:22:42.333539+00:00", "reviewRound": 1, "followUp": false, "probes": "P6-4, P6-8; P6-9 idempotency control", "bodyParagraphs": [ "The demo reconciler returns SUCCEEDED for every receipt and keeps no operation records. A receipt proves that the runtime attempted dispatch; it does not prove that the executor applied the operation. The executor also ignores repeated idempotency keys while advertising runtime-key idempotency.", "P6-8 runs the real pipeline with a dispatch wrapper that throws before calling the demo executor. The runtime correctly journals UNKNOWN, and world.invoked is empty. A fresh runtime recovers that journal and calls the demo reconciler, which changes the effect to SUCCEEDED even though no invocation occurred. P6-4 confirms the same result for a completely unknown receipt. P6-9 invokes the same request twice and records A twice.", "Keep a small operation-result map in the demo world, keyed and checked by the dispatched operation identity. Known duplicate keys should return the recorded result without another application. Reconciliation must return UNKNOWN for absent or mismatched operations. No durable external executor service is needed here; after a fresh demo world loses its operation records, UNKNOWN is the truthful result." ], "fix": "Record applied operations and results in the demo executor, deduplicate known idempotency keys, and reconcile only matching recorded outcomes. Unknown receipts must remain UNKNOWN.", "prompt": "Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nIn `apps/inspector/src/demo.ts` around lines 109-120, replace unconditional successful reconciliation with evidence from a small executor operation registry. P6-8 in `/tmp/circe-pr6-evidence/inspector.test.ts` throws before the demo invoke, recovers the resulting UNKNOWN effect, and shows it incorrectly becomes SUCCEEDED when reconciled. P6-4 checks an entirely unknown receipt and P6-9 checks repeated runtime keys. Record results only for operations actually applied, use the operation key to return the same result on duplicate dispatch, and validate receipt identity before returning a known outcome. Return UNKNOWN for missing records. Keep this in-process demo implementation small; no new persistence layer is required.", "verifiedAtCommit": "0d9e510b77a44c8f9f522a017876f27c60630453", "verification": "P6-4/P6-8/P6-9 pass: absent operations stay UNKNOWN and immediate identical requests deduplicate. F71 covers new operation-record defects." }, { "id": "f68", "title": "Decode canonical identity components before returning refs", "file": "apps/inspector/src/demo.ts", "lines": "66-70", "pBadge": "P2", "severity": "minor", "type": "logic", "category": "correctness", "section": "actionable", "status": "fixed", "fixedAt": "2026-09-23T15:22:42.333539+00:00", "reviewRound": 1, "followUp": false, "probes": "P6-1", "bodyParagraphs": [ "The authority stores entities under entityRefKey, then splits that escaped key on pipes and treats each component as the original string. entityRefKey escapes colons, pipes and percent signs. Splitting identifies component boundaries but does not undo those escapes.", "P6-1 observes the valid ID A:pipe|percent%. The returned ID is A%3Apipe%7Cpercent%25, a different entity. When observation ingestion keys it again, it is escaped a second time. The originally requested reference no longer matches its evidence, causing valid targets to disappear or lack usable version evidence.", "Use the existing decodeIdentityComponent helper for all four components, or retain the original EntityRef alongside the demo entity. This is an identity fix; the simple A/B fixtures currently hide it." ], "fix": "Decode all split components with the core identity helper, or store original refs instead of reconstructing them from keys.", "prompt": "Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nIn `apps/inspector/src/demo.ts` around lines 66-70, reconstruct canonical entity references correctly. P6-1 in `/tmp/circe-pr6-evidence/inspector.test.ts` observes ID `A:pipe|percent%` and receives the literal encoded ID instead. `entityRefKey` escapes each component, so splitting alone does not invert it and the context store later double-encodes the result. Use the exported `decodeIdentityComponent` helper on every component, or retain the original ref with each demo entity. Cover percent, colon and pipe characters and preserve authority/namespace/type as well as ID. Keep the ordinary A/B observation control passing.", "verifiedAtCommit": "0d9e510b77a44c8f9f522a017876f27c60630453", "verification": "P6-1 escaped ref identity passes." }, { "id": "f69", "title": "Close writable test journals before deleting their directories", "file": "apps/inspector/src/pipeline.test.ts", "lines": "29-49", "pBadge": "P2", "severity": "minor", "type": "logic", "category": "stability", "section": "actionable", "status": "fixed", "fixedAt": "2026-09-23T15:22:42.333539+00:00", "reviewRound": 1, "followUp": false, "probes": "fd-cleanup.test.ts afterAll assertion", "bodyParagraphs": [ "The input helper creates a FileJournal but returns it through the narrower InteractionJournal field. Tests pass it inline to the pipeline and then remove the temporary directory in finally without closing the writable handle. The pipeline correctly treats its injected journal as caller-owned, so it cannot clean up the lost reference for these tests.", "The independent cleanup probe imports and runs all six retained inspector tests, then inspects /proc/self/fd. Four descriptors still point to deleted circe-inspector journal files. Linux permits the deletion and the tests pass, but repeated runs leak descriptors and hold the unlinked files until process exit. Read-only recovery handles are lazy and do not account for these four leaks.", "Retain each FileJournal in the test fixture and close it in finally before rmSync. Apply the same explicit ownership pattern to any handle that can append. The CLI closes its writable journal already; this finding concerns the test fixture." ], "fix": "Have the fixture retain and expose the FileJournal or a cleanup callback; close writable journals before removing temporary directories in every finally block.", "prompt": "Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nIn `apps/inspector/src/pipeline.test.ts` around lines 29-49 and the per-test finally blocks, retain the concrete FileJournal created by the input helper and close it before deleting its temporary directory. `/tmp/circe-pr6-evidence/fd-cleanup.test.ts` runs the existing six tests and finds four still-open descriptors pointing to deleted journal files. The pipeline should not close a caller-owned journal, so fix resource ownership in the test fixture rather than changing the pipeline contract. Keep cleanup exception-safe and close every handle that can append. Do not treat the lazy read-only recovery handles as the source of these four leaks.", "verifiedAtCommit": "0d9e510b77a44c8f9f522a017876f27c60630453", "verification": "Cleanup assertion passes after all ten current inspector tests; no leaked writable journal descriptors." }, { "id": "f70", "title": "Remove the unused recursive reference walker", "file": "packages/perception/src/proposals.ts", "lines": "298-316", "pBadge": "P2", "severity": "minor", "type": "style", "category": "maintainability", "section": "duplicate", "status": "fixed", "fixedAt": "2026-09-23T15:22:42.333539+00:00", "reviewRound": 1, "followUp": false, "probes": "Static reference search: only definition and self-calls", "bodyParagraphs": [ "The only substantive shared perception change in this PR adds collectRefKeys, but nothing calls it outside its own recursive body. The active argument exclusion and evidence paths already use argumentRefsOf. This new traversal contributes no protection to the inspector pipeline.", "Keeping an unused second implementation makes the security-sensitive argument handling harder to assess and suggests a check is active when it is not. The new helper also lacks the safeguards of the existing argument validation path. It is dead code, so that difference is not currently an execution defect.", "Delete the unused helper and the stray blank line added in compileSemanticTurn. The inspector PR can then leave this shared compiler file unchanged. This cleanup is nonblocking, but it directly reduces unnecessary code in an already reviewed boundary." ], "fix": "Remove collectRefKeys and its incidental whitespace change; retain the existing argumentRefsOf-based validation.", "prompt": "Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nIn `packages/perception/src/proposals.ts` around lines 298-316, remove the unused `collectRefKeys` helper introduced by PR #6. A repository reference search finds only its declaration and recursive self-calls; the actual compiler uses `argumentRefsOf` for argument evidence and exclusion checks. Do not wire this helper into the execution path to justify its presence, since that would duplicate an existing reviewed contract. Remove the extra blank line near compileSemanticTurn as part of the same cleanup. Re-run perception/eval tests and typecheck. This is a nonblocking maintainability item, not another safety mechanism to implement.", "verifiedAtCommit": "0d9e510b77a44c8f9f522a017876f27c60630453", "verification": "Unused collectRefKeys removed. The remaining blank line is harmless and is not an open finding." }, { "id": "f71", "title": "Store immutable request identity and the original operation result", "file": "apps/inspector/src/demo.ts", "lines": "120-155", "pBadge": "P2", "severity": "minor", "type": "logic", "category": "data-integrity", "section": "actionable", "status": "open", "fixedAt": null, "reviewRound": 2, "followUp": false, "probes": "R2-1, R2-2, R2-3", "bodyParagraphs": [ "The new operation map stores effect IDs and refs, but no request identity or result. invoke validates current preconditions before checking the map; when a key already exists, it skips application and synthesizes success for the incoming request. These paths do not implement replay of a recorded operation.", "R2-1 applies A at version 1, changes the world to version 2, then repeats the identical request. The repeated call returns STALE_REFERENCE despite the recorded success. R2-2 reuses the same key and effect ID with target B: the executor returns success even though only A was applied. Reconciliation and invoke can therefore disagree about the same operation, or success can be attached to a different payload.", "R2-3 exposes a related ownership gap: request.effectIds is stored by reference. Appending never-applied to that array after invocation causes reconciliation to report SUCCEEDED for that effect. The record must be a detached account of what happened, rather than mutable caller data.", "Keep the small in-process map, but store a detached operation fingerprint, effect membership and original result. On a known key, check identity and return the recorded result before consulting current world versions; reject conflicting payloads. Check live preconditions only for a new operation. This is a nonblocking P2 in the demo, and needs no additional service or generic retry framework." ], "fix": "Snapshot request identity, effect IDs and the applied result. Resolve known matching keys from that record before revalidating world state; reject conflicting key reuse and detach stored arrays.", "prompt": "Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.\n\nIn `apps/inspector/src/demo.ts` around lines 120-155, make the new operation map a detached record of request identity and result. R2-1 in `/tmp/circe-pr6-evidence/round2.test.ts` changes the world after success and gets a stale failure on an identical replay. R2-2 reuses the key with target B and gets success without applying B. R2-3 mutates the supplied effectIds array after invoke and can then reconcile a never-applied effect as successful. For an existing key, compare a stable operation fingerprint and return the original result before live precondition checks; reject conflicting payloads. Copy effect membership and results when storing them. Keep the in-process map and the absent-operation UNKNOWN behavior; no new framework is needed.", "verifiedAtCommit": "e7743111bea382d634bd492a831f445f8e9833b8", "verification": "F71 is substantially fixed: replay after drift, conflicting target payloads and caller-mutated effect membership now pass. One identity gap remains in the known-key branch. Its fingerprint omits effect identity, and its success receipt uses the incoming request.effectId. R3-1 repeats a recorded key and payload with a new effect ID and receives a success receipt for that never-recorded effect. Reject changed effect membership or return the original recorded receipt; do not mint a receipt from the replay request. This remains a nonblocking P2 in the demo executor.", "currentLines": "137-156" } ], "architectureAssessment": "No remaining merge blockers. The unique option lookup fixes the host identity ambiguity, and the operation registry now handles ordinary replay, payload conflicts and caller-owned membership arrays. The changes are localized and use the existing host/executor contracts. A nonblocking receipt-identity gap remains in the demo replay branch. Returning the original recorded outcome would also make that branch simpler.", "scopeLimits": "This remains a scripted integration demonstration. It does not interpret arbitrary utterances, call a live Jev SDK, measure held-out semantic accuracy, or prove external work was resumed. The demo records invocations and returns success; the CLI phrase \u201cintended task resumed\u201d should be read within that demo scope. Real semantic interpretation and calibration remain deferred, as stated in the PR.", "inheritedLimitations": [ "N2/N3 status-getter cases from PR #5 remain inherited and excluded from PR #6 findings. The normal Jev wrapper snapshots status; ordinary Jev controls pass." ], "history": [ { "round": 1, "at": "2026-09-23T15:08:42.618881+00:00", "commit": "d5723b4e88eff95624cd33f0b14ecbbac8d7cce5", "actionableOpen": 6, "note": "PR5 merged; PR6 rebased patch-identically onto main and pushed with explicit lease. Initial review reports six findings, three merge blockers." }, { "round": 2, "at": "2026-09-23T15:22:42.333539+00:00", "commit": "0d9e510b77a44c8f9f522a017876f27c60630453", "actionableOpen": 2, "note": "All original reproductions pass. F65 remains open after duplicate-local-ID probe. F66-F70 fixed. Add F71 for new registry defects." }, { "round": 3, "at": "2026-09-23T15:31:10.986856+00:00", "commit": "e7743111bea382d634bd492a831f445f8e9833b8", "actionableOpen": 1, "verdict": "COMMENT", "note": "F65 closed. F71 original reproductions pass; retain it for receipt identity on a changed effect ID. No remaining merge blockers." } ], "verification": { "repositoryTests": 394, "repositoryBreakdown": { "evals": 323, "journalFile": 40, "perceptionJev": 17, "inspector": 14 }, "previousInspectorReviewCases": 28, "previousInspectorReviewPassed": 28, "cleanupAssertion": "pass", "priorIndependentCases": 140, "priorIndependentPassed": 138, "inheritedFailures": 2, "newCases": 2, "newFailures": 1, "newPassed": 1, "combinedIndependentCases": 170, "combinedIndependentPassed": 167, "combinedIndependentFailed": 3, "typecheck": "pass", "probeTypecheck": "pass", "cli": "exit 0", "diffCheck": "pass", "summary": "All 394 repository tests pass: 323 evals, 40 journal-file, 17 perception-jev and 14 inspector. Repository and probe typechecks, CLI and git diff --check pass. All 28 cases in the previous inspector review suite pass, including the cleanup assertion. The 140 prior independent probes retain 138 passes and two inherited status-getter failures. Two new probes have one pass and one failure for the remaining F71 gap. Combined independent runs: 167 passes and three failures across 170 cases; two failures are inherited and one is the nonblocking demo receipt issue." }, "syncMeta": { "instructions": "Preserve baseline and original finding bodies/prompts. Review incrementally from lastReviewCommit. Keep inherited failures separate from PR-introduced findings." } }